Skip to main content

SAT cross-text connections questions: how to answer them

How the author of one text would respond to a claim, finding or method in another text on the same topic.

Practise cross-text connections →Timed module

What the question looks like

Each question has its own short text (a passage, a pair of texts, a table or a student's notes) and four options. The usual question is: Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the claim in Text 1?

How to answer it

  1. Summarise each text in one line: what does each author claim, and why?
  2. Find exactly what the question points to in Text 1 (a claim, a piece of evidence, a conclusion).
  3. Decide the relationship: does Text 2 agree, disagree, agree in part, or add a condition?
  4. Prefer the option that matches the strength of Text 2's view: 'partly true' is not 'false'.

Common traps

In the harder second module

In the hard module, Text 2 usually accepts Text 1's evidence but questions the conclusion drawn from it, often by pointing to another cause or an unchecked assumption.

Worked example

Worked example (easier)

Text 1

Many schools ban phones during lessons. Supporters say students concentrate better without the constant temptation to check messages.

Text 2

A teacher in Ohio found that letting students use phones to look up words and check facts during reading lessons made them more engaged. She argues that a total ban throws away a useful tool.

Based on the texts, how would the teacher in Text 2 most likely respond to the supporters of the ban in Text 1?

  1. By arguing that phones can help learning in some lessons
  2. By claiming that students never check messages in class
  3. By agreeing that phones should be banned in every lesson
  4. By suggesting that schools should buy every student a phone

Answer: A: By arguing that phones can help learning in some lessons

The teacher says phones made students more engaged and calls a total ban wasteful, so she would point out that phones can be useful for learning.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B: She makes no claim that students never check messages.
  • C: She opposes a total ban.
  • D: Buying phones for students is never suggested.

Practice questions

Try each one before you open the answer. Every answer explains why the right option is right and why each of the other three is wrong. Answers to the first 4 are open to everyone; the rest need only a free account. Questions use American English, as the SAT does.

Question 1 (medium)

Text 1

The city's new bike lanes have been a success: the number of cyclists on Main Street has doubled since they opened. Clearly, if you build safe lanes, people will ride.

Text 2

Before declaring the bike lanes a success, we should note that the city also closed two nearby bus routes the same month. Some of the new cyclists may simply be former bus riders who had no other choice.

Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the conclusion in Text 1?

  1. By arguing that the number of cyclists has not actually increased
  2. By pointing out that another change may explain part of the increase in cycling
  3. By claiming that buses are safer than bicycles
  4. By agreeing that the bike lanes are the only reason more people are cycling
Show the answer and why each option is right or wrong

Answer: B: By pointing out that another change may explain part of the increase in cycling

Text 2 accepts that more people cycle but suggests the bus closures, not just the lanes, may account for some of them.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A: Text 2 does not dispute the increase; it questions its cause.
  • C: Safety of buses versus bicycles is not discussed.
  • D: Text 2 explicitly raises another possible cause.

Question 2 (hard)

Text 1

The giant sloths of South America vanished soon after humans arrived on the continent. Paleontologist Ruth Akerman argues that this timing points to hunting as the main cause: sloths, slow and unafraid of people, would have been easy prey.

Text 2

Pollen records analyzed by Mateo Quispe show that the grasslands where many giant sloths fed were shrinking rapidly in the same centuries, as the climate warmed. Quispe notes that in areas where grasslands survived longer, sloth fossils continue later, even though humans were present there too.

Based on the texts, how would Quispe (Text 2) most likely respond to Akerman's argument (Text 1)?

  1. He would argue that humans arrived in South America much later than Akerman assumes.
  2. He would agree that hunting was the main cause, because sloths disappeared where humans were present.
  3. He would argue that the timing she cites is consistent with a different explanation, and that his evidence favors that explanation.
  4. He would claim that giant sloths survived the warming climate by changing their diet.
Show the answer and why each option is right or wrong

Answer: C: He would argue that the timing she cites is consistent with a different explanation, and that his evidence favors that explanation.

Akerman relies on timing. Quispe shows climate change happened at the same time, and that sloths lasted longer where grasslands survived despite humans being there, which favors habitat loss over hunting.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A: Quispe does not dispute the date of human arrival.
  • B: Quispe's evidence that sloths persisted where humans lived but grasslands survived points away from hunting.
  • D: Nothing suggests sloths changed their diet; Quispe links their disappearance to shrinking grasslands.

Question 3 (hard)

Text 1

The town's annual festival, critics say, has become a tourist spectacle. Its parade once featured local farmers and craftspeople; now it is dominated by hired performers, and residents increasingly avoid it.

Text 2

Anthropologist Nadia Kowalczyk has studied the festival for twenty years. She acknowledges the hired performers but notes that residents have moved their own celebrations to the night before, in neighborhood gatherings that outsiders rarely see. The tradition, she argues, has not died but relocated.

Based on the texts, how would Kowalczyk (Text 2) most likely respond to the critics' claim in Text 1?

  1. She would deny that hired performers now take part in the parade.
  2. She would accept their description of the parade but dispute the conclusion that local tradition has been lost.
  3. She would argue that tourists are the main participants in the neighborhood gatherings.
  4. She would agree that residents have stopped celebrating the festival.
Show the answer and why each option is right or wrong

Answer: B: She would accept their description of the parade but dispute the conclusion that local tradition has been lost.

She 'acknowledges the hired performers', but says residents celebrate elsewhere: the tradition has relocated rather than died.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A: She acknowledges the hired performers.
  • C: She says outsiders rarely see the neighborhood gatherings.
  • D: She says residents still celebrate, just at a different time and place.

Question 4 (hard)

Text 1

Film scholar Daniela Moreau argues that the director's use of long, unbroken shots is a way of showing respect for the actors, giving them space to develop a scene without the interference of editing.

Text 2

The director's own production notes, recently published, reveal that the long takes were largely a response to her tiny budget: editing equipment was expensive to rent, and filming each scene in one shot saved days of work. The notes say nothing about the actors.

Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to Moreau's argument (Text 1)?

  1. By arguing that the director's films contain no long takes
  2. By suggesting that a practical reason may better explain the technique she interprets as respect for the actors
  3. By agreeing that the director chose long takes to give the actors space
  4. By claiming that the director's budget was larger than scholars believe
Show the answer and why each option is right or wrong

Answer: B: By suggesting that a practical reason may better explain the technique she interprets as respect for the actors

Text 2 cites the director's notes showing that long takes saved money and time, with no mention of actors, which offers a practical alternative to Moreau's interpretation.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A: Text 2 confirms the long takes exist and explains them.
  • C: The notes give a budget reason and say nothing about the actors.
  • D: Text 2 describes the budget as tiny.

Question 5 (medium)

Text 1

Historian Laila Mansour argues that the printing press spread new ideas mainly by making books cheaper. When a book cost a fraction of what a hand-copied manuscript did, she says, ordinary merchants and craftspeople could finally afford to read.

Text 2

Historian Peter Lindgren agrees that printed books were cheaper, but notes that most people in the period could not read at all. He argues that printed ideas often spread through public readings and sermons, reaching listeners who never owned a book.

Based on the texts, how would Lindgren (Text 2) most likely respond to Mansour's argument (Text 1)?

  1. He would reject her claim that printed books were cheaper than manuscripts.
  2. He would claim that sermons did more than printing to make books cheaper.
  3. He would argue that merchants and craftspeople were the people least likely to read.
  4. He would accept her point about cost but argue that it does not fully explain how ideas reached most people.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 6 (medium)

Text 1

Some nutrition researchers recommend eating breakfast every day, citing studies in which people who ate breakfast weighed less on average than people who skipped it.

Text 2

In a trial by Grace Okafor, volunteers were randomly assigned either to eat breakfast or to skip it for sixteen weeks. Weight changed by almost exactly the same amount in both groups. Okafor suggests that earlier studies may have mistaken a habit shared by health-conscious people for a cause of lower weight.

Based on the texts, how would Okafor (Text 2) most likely respond to the recommendation in Text 1?

  1. She would agree that eating breakfast causes lower weight.
  2. She would argue that skipping breakfast causes people to lose weight.
  3. She would argue that health-conscious people tend to skip breakfast.
  4. She would argue that the studies behind it show a correlation that may not reflect cause and effect.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 7 (hard)

Text 1

Literary critic Simone Achebe-Wright argues that the novelist's habit of ending chapters mid-sentence is a gimmick. Readers, she says, are briefly intrigued, but the device soon feels like a trick to keep them turning pages rather than an expression of anything in the story.

Text 2

The novel's chapter breaks fall almost exclusively at moments when the narrator, who suffers from memory loss, is interrupted by a doctor or a nurse. Read this way, the unfinished sentences are not a device to hook the reader but a record of the narrator's broken experience of time.

Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to Achebe-Wright's claim in Text 1?

  1. By arguing that the novel's narrator is unreliable
  2. By agreeing that the device keeps readers turning pages
  3. By arguing that the device she dismisses is connected to the novel's content
  4. By claiming that readers are never intrigued by unfinished sentences

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 8 (hard)

Text 1

Proponents of 'rewilding' argue that reintroducing large predators such as wolves can restore damaged ecosystems. When wolves returned to one valley, deer stopped lingering along rivers, and willows that the deer had been eating grew back, stabilizing the riverbanks.

Text 2

Ecologist Hannah Rees cautions against treating the valley as a template. In that case, she notes, the predators returned before the willows' roots had died off completely. In landscapes where decades of grazing have removed the plants entirely and eroded the soil, she argues, the return of predators alone may change little.

Based on the texts, how would Rees (Text 2) most likely describe the outcome presented in Text 1?

  1. As proof that grazing does not damage riverbanks
  2. As genuine, but dependent on conditions that may not exist elsewhere
  3. As evidence that predators should never be reintroduced
  4. As the result of a measurement error

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 9 (hard)

Text 1

Economist Farid Rahimi argues that raising the minimum wage in a city leads restaurants to hire fewer workers, because labor becomes more expensive. He points to a city where restaurant employment grew more slowly after a wage increase than it had in the previous five years.

Text 2

Comparing that city with a neighboring city that did not raise its wage, economist Jun Park found that restaurant employment slowed by almost exactly the same amount in both places over the same period. A regional downturn, he concludes, affected restaurants on both sides of the city line.

Based on the texts, how would Park (Text 2) most likely respond to Rahimi's evidence (Text 1)?

  1. He would agree that the wage increase caused the slowdown, since employment slowed in both cities.
  2. He would argue that raising the minimum wage always increases employment.
  3. He would say that the slowdown Rahimi describes cannot be attributed to the wage increase, since a similar slowdown occurred where wages did not rise.
  4. He would say that the slowdown in restaurant employment never actually happened.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 10 (hard)

Text 1

Many music teachers insist that beginners learn to read notation before playing by ear. Without notation, they argue, students develop habits they later struggle to unlearn and cannot tackle complex pieces on their own.

Text 2

Researchers who followed beginning violinists for two years found that students who spent their first six months playing by ear went on to read notation as accurately as those who started with it, and they played more expressively. The order in which skills are learned, the researchers conclude, may matter less than teachers assume.

Based on the texts, how would the researchers in Text 2 most likely respond to the teachers' position in Text 1?

  1. They would argue that notation should never be taught.
  2. They would agree that students who learn by ear never learn to read notation.
  3. They would argue that their findings undercut the teachers' concern about learning by ear first.
  4. They would claim that expressive playing depends mainly on reading notation.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 11 (hard)

Text 1

Art historian Chloé Vasseur dates the unsigned portrait to about 1650, citing the sitter's lace collar, a style that went out of fashion soon after.

Text 2

Analysis of the canvas by conservator Ravi Menon found a pigment, Prussian blue, in the background. Prussian blue was not available to painters until the early 1700s. Menon notes that old-fashioned clothing sometimes appears in later portraits, particularly when a family commissioned a likeness of an ancestor from an earlier image.

Based on the texts, how would Menon (Text 2) most likely respond to Vasseur's reasoning (Text 1)?

  1. He would argue that Prussian blue was available in 1650.
  2. He would agree that the painting dates to 1650 because of the sitter's collar.
  3. He would claim that the sitter was painted from life in the early 1700s wearing fashionable clothes.
  4. He would argue that the collar does not settle the date, because the pigment shows the painting was made later and older clothing could appear in later works.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 12 (hard)

Text 1

Cognitive scientist Amelia Ross argues that taking notes by hand helps students remember lectures better than typing does. Because handwriting is slower, she says, students cannot copy every word and must instead summarize, which forces them to process the material.

Text 2

In a study by Tomás Ferreira, students who typed notes but were instructed to summarize in their own words remembered lectures as well as students who wrote by hand. Students who typed without that instruction tended to copy lectures word for word and remembered less.

Based on the texts, how would Ferreira (Text 2) most likely respond to Ross's argument (Text 1)?

  1. He would argue that typing notes is always more effective than writing by hand.
  2. He would argue that students who write by hand copy lectures word for word.
  3. He would reject the idea that summarizing helps students remember.
  4. He would suggest that summarizing, rather than handwriting itself, is what matters, so typists can benefit if they summarize.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 13 (hard)

Text 1

Some astronomers have proposed that the unusual dimming of a distant star is caused by a vast swarm of comets passing in front of it. Comets, they note, are common around young stars and could block light irregularly, as observed.

Text 2

Astronomer Leila Farouk points out that the star is not young; it is several billion years old. She adds that comets large enough in number to block the observed amount of light would also glow in infrared as they were warmed by the star, yet no such glow has been detected.

Based on the texts, how would Farouk (Text 2) most likely respond to the proposal in Text 1?

  1. She would argue that the proposal depends on an assumption that does not fit this star and predicts a signal that has not been found.
  2. She would claim that young stars never have comets around them.
  3. She would agree that comets are the most likely cause, since comets block light irregularly.
  4. She would argue that the star is not actually dimming.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 14 (hard)

Text 1

According to one common view, a language dies when its last fluent speaker dies. After that, the language survives only as a record in books and recordings, of interest to scholars but no longer part of anyone's life.

Text 2

Linguist Emil Sarkis has worked with communities reviving languages that had no fluent speakers for decades. Using old dictionaries and recordings, families have raised children who speak these languages at home. Sarkis prefers the term 'sleeping' to 'dead' for languages without current speakers.

Based on the texts, how would Sarkis (Text 2) most likely respond to the view described in Text 1?

  1. He would argue that languages never lose all their fluent speakers.
  2. He would claim that recordings are more useful than dictionaries for reviving a language.
  3. He would agree that records of a language are of interest only to scholars.
  4. He would argue that the view is too final, since records can allow a language to be spoken again.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 15 (hard)

Text 1

Dr. Ama Boateng's survey of 2,000 office workers found that those who worked in open-plan offices reported more interruptions than those in private offices. Boateng concludes that open-plan offices reduce productivity.

Text 2

Productivity, management researcher Kai Lindholm notes, is not the same as a feeling of being interrupted. In his study, teams in open-plan offices reported more interruptions but completed shared projects faster than teams in private offices, apparently because questions were answered on the spot.

Based on the texts, how would Lindholm (Text 2) most likely respond to Boateng's conclusion (Text 1)?

  1. He would claim that her survey included too few workers to be reliable.
  2. He would argue that workers in open-plan offices are not interrupted more often.
  3. He would argue that her evidence measures interruptions, not productivity, and that at least one kind of productivity rose in open-plan offices.
  4. He would agree that open-plan offices reduce productivity in every type of work.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 16 (hard)

Text 1

Historians have often portrayed the 1890s canal workers' strike as a failure, since the workers' main demand, a shorter working day, was refused.

Text 2

Labor historian Ines Duarte points out that within a year of the strike, the canal company quietly introduced paid rest breaks and safety rails along the locks, changes the strikers had listed as secondary demands. Judging the strike only by its headline demand, she argues, misses much of what it achieved.

Based on the texts, how would Duarte (Text 2) most likely respond to the portrayal in Text 1?

  1. She would argue that the workers' main demand was in fact granted.
  2. She would claim that the company introduced the changes before the strike began.
  3. She would agree that the strike achieved nothing for the workers.
  4. She would argue that it rests on too narrow a measure of the strike's results.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 17 (hard)

Text 1

Sociologist Rachel Adeyemi argues that public libraries remain essential mainly because they provide free internet access to people who cannot afford it at home.

Text 2

Surveys by Tobias Engel found that, as home internet has become more widespread, library visits have not fallen. Many visitors now come for children's programs, quiet study space, and help from librarians with government forms. Engel argues that libraries' importance rests on far more than any single service.

Based on the texts, how would Engel (Text 2) most likely respond to Adeyemi's argument (Text 1)?

  1. He would agree that libraries are essential but argue that internet access is only one of several reasons.
  2. He would claim that library visits have fallen sharply.
  3. He would argue that libraries should stop offering internet access.
  4. He would argue that libraries are no longer essential because most people have home internet.

The solution is free with a free account.

Question 18 (hard)

Text 1

Biologist Noor Haidari observed that a species of desert beetle collects drinking water by standing head-down in morning fog, letting droplets form on its back and roll toward its mouth. She suggests that the bumps on the beetle's shell, which attract water, are an adaptation for this behavior.

Text 2

Comparing the shells of several related beetle species, Lars Eriksen found similar water-attracting bumps on species that live in humid forests and never encounter fog. He suggests that the bumps first evolved for some other purpose and were only later put to use for fog collection by the desert species.

Based on the texts, how would Eriksen (Text 2) most likely respond to Haidari's suggestion (Text 1)?

  1. He would deny that the desert beetle collects water from fog.
  2. He would claim that the bumps on the desert beetle repel water.
  3. He would argue that the forest species also collect water from fog.
  4. He would agree that the desert beetle uses the bumps to collect fog but question whether they originally evolved for that purpose.

The solution is free with a free account.

Keep going

SAT is a trademark registered by College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, IB Math Revision. Every passage and question here is our own; people, studies and data in the passages are fictional unless they are well-known history.