IA idea · Modelling with functions

Is a hanging chain a parabola? Catenary versus quadratic models

AA SLAA HLAI SLAI HL Solid Also in: Calculus, Art & music

Research question

How much better does a catenary y = a cosh(x/a) + c describe a hanging chain than the best-fitting parabola, and does the difference matter for a real design?

Adapt it: change the place, the data or the comparison until the question is yours.

Why it makes a good exploration

Galileo thought a hanging chain formed a parabola; it does not, but the two curves are so close that the difference is surprisingly hard to see. Measuring a real chain and quantifying the gap is a lovely way to test a famous claim with your own data.

The mathematics you'll need

  • Quadratic models through three points and by least squares (SL)
  • Exponential functions and the definition cosh x = (eˣ + e⁻ˣ)/2 — new, explain it
  • Sum of squared residuals to compare models
  • Derivatives to find the angle the chain makes at its supports
  • HL: arc length by integration, or solving for the parameter numerically

Course labels show where a technique sits; using maths from outside your course is fine if you explain it clearly and say it is new to you.

Where the data comes from

Hang a light chain or necklace against a grid (or photograph it square-on with a ruler in shot), read 15–25 points off the photo in GeoGebra, and repeat for two different span-to-sag ratios.

  • GeoGebra — Free geometry and graphing software — Voronoi diagrams, loci and regression built in.
  • Desmos graphing calculator — Free graphing and regression (y₁ ~ ax₁ + b) — fit models to your data and show residuals.

Cite every source in a footnote where you use it and in your bibliography. Check the licence of any dataset you download.

A possible outline

  1. Photograph the chain square-on and set up axes with the lowest point at the origin; state your scale.
  2. Fit a parabola by least squares; record the residuals.
  3. Introduce the catenary, explain where cosh comes from, and choose a by trial or technology.
  4. Compare the models with residual plots and sums of squares; repeat for a deeper sag where the curves diverge more.
  5. Discuss where the difference matters (arches, cables) and where it does not.

Pitfalls that cost marks

  • Photographing at an angle — perspective distorts the shape more than the difference you are trying to measure.
  • Claiming the catenary is “better” from one number without looking at where the residuals are.
  • Using cosh without explaining what it is; unfamiliar maths must be explained.

Showing personal engagement

  • Predict before measuring which model will win and by how much.
  • Link it to a structure you know (a local bridge, the Gateway Arch, a washing line) and check it.
  • Explain why the difference grows as the chain sags more — and test that prediction.

See Criterion C: personal engagement for what examiners look for.

Taking it further

HL students can derive the catenary from a force balance (a differential equation) or compute the chain's length by integration and compare it with the measured length.

Turn this idea into your IA

Similar ideas

All modelling ideas · Browse all 153 IA ideas