IA idea · Modelling with functions
Is a hanging chain a parabola? Catenary versus quadratic models
Research question
How much better does a catenary y = a cosh(x/a) + c describe a hanging chain than the best-fitting parabola, and does the difference matter for a real design?
Adapt it: change the place, the data or the comparison until the question is yours.
Why it makes a good exploration
Galileo thought a hanging chain formed a parabola; it does not, but the two curves are so close that the difference is surprisingly hard to see. Measuring a real chain and quantifying the gap is a lovely way to test a famous claim with your own data.
The mathematics you'll need
- Quadratic models through three points and by least squares (SL)
- Exponential functions and the definition cosh x = (eˣ + e⁻ˣ)/2 — new, explain it
- Sum of squared residuals to compare models
- Derivatives to find the angle the chain makes at its supports
- HL: arc length by integration, or solving for the parameter numerically
Course labels show where a technique sits; using maths from outside your course is fine if you explain it clearly and say it is new to you.
Where the data comes from
Hang a light chain or necklace against a grid (or photograph it square-on with a ruler in shot), read 15–25 points off the photo in GeoGebra, and repeat for two different span-to-sag ratios.
- GeoGebra — Free geometry and graphing software — Voronoi diagrams, loci and regression built in.
- Desmos graphing calculator — Free graphing and regression (y₁ ~ ax₁ + b) — fit models to your data and show residuals.
Cite every source in a footnote where you use it and in your bibliography. Check the licence of any dataset you download.
A possible outline
- Photograph the chain square-on and set up axes with the lowest point at the origin; state your scale.
- Fit a parabola by least squares; record the residuals.
- Introduce the catenary, explain where cosh comes from, and choose a by trial or technology.
- Compare the models with residual plots and sums of squares; repeat for a deeper sag where the curves diverge more.
- Discuss where the difference matters (arches, cables) and where it does not.
Pitfalls that cost marks
- Photographing at an angle — perspective distorts the shape more than the difference you are trying to measure.
- Claiming the catenary is “better” from one number without looking at where the residuals are.
- Using cosh without explaining what it is; unfamiliar maths must be explained.
Showing personal engagement
- Predict before measuring which model will win and by how much.
- Link it to a structure you know (a local bridge, the Gateway Arch, a washing line) and check it.
- Explain why the difference grows as the chain sags more — and test that prediction.
See Criterion C: personal engagement for what examiners look for.
Taking it further
HL students can derive the catenary from a force balance (a differential equation) or compute the chain's length by integration and compare it with the measured length.
See it done
Our annotated exemplar Is a hanging chain a parabola? Comparing catenary and quadratic models (AA SL) explores a question like this one, with an examiner's comment on every criterion.
Turn this idea into your IA
Similar ideas
- Why are camera f-stops 1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6?AA SLAI SLAA HLAI HLAccessible
- How long does a bottle take to drain? Testing Torricelli's lawAA SLAA HLAI SLAI HLSolid
- Why aren't drinks cans the optimal shape?AA SLAI SLAA HLAI HLAccessible
- Why do a flute and a violin sound different on the same note?AA SLAA HLAI SLAI HLSolid