IA idea · Pure maths, number & proof
Beyond Fibonacci: what ratio do other recurrence sequences approach?
Research question
For sequences defined by uₙ₊₂ = a·uₙ₊₁ + b·uₙ, what limit does uₙ₊₁/uₙ approach, when does it exist, and can the limit be proved using the characteristic equation?
Adapt it: change the place, the data or the comparison until the question is yours.
Why it makes a good exploration
Everyone knows Fibonacci ratios approach the golden ratio. Generalising to any linear recurrence — and discovering when the ratio converges, oscillates or diverges — turns a cliché into a genuine investigation.
The mathematics you'll need
- Sequences and recurrence relations
- Quadratic characteristic equations
- Closed forms (Binet-style) proved by induction (HL)
- Limits and dominant roots
- Complex roots and oscillation (HL)
Course labels show where a technique sits; using maths from outside your course is fine if you explain it clearly and say it is new to you.
Where the data comes from
No data needed; use a spreadsheet to explore many (a, b) pairs; check known sequences on OEIS.
- OEIS (On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences) — Check a sequence you have found and read its known formulas and references.
- Desmos graphing calculator — Free graphing and regression (y₁ ~ ax₁ + b) — fit models to your data and show residuals.
Cite every source in a footnote where you use it and in your bibliography. Check the licence of any dataset you download.
A possible outline
- Explore numerically for many (a, b).
- Conjecture the limit in terms of the characteristic roots.
- Derive a closed form and prove it by induction.
- Classify cases: real distinct, repeated, complex roots.
- Reflect on the golden ratio's special status.
Pitfalls that cost marks
- Only numerical tables.
- Ignoring cases where the limit does not exist.
- Copying Binet's formula without derivation.
Showing personal engagement
- Find your own recurrence with an interesting limit.
- Map the (a, b) plane into regions by behaviour.
- Explain where the golden-ratio myths go wrong.
See Criterion C: personal engagement for what examiners look for.
Taking it further
Investigate three-term recurrences and the “tribonacci” constant.